770 Vs 1060 Benchmark

Nosotros've had plenty suggestions lately to revisit older hardware that we thought it was time. The GTX 770 2GB cards first shipped in May of 2013, mark the GPU now iii years sometime, and launched at a $400 price-point. That makes the GTX 1070 the most linear upgrade -- information technology'south a direct path in nomenclature and in price, also around $400 -- but it'due south not lone in this market. The RX 480 convincingly outperforms the GTX 770, as does the GTX 1060. More curious, though, is the once mighty GTX 770's operation in relation to the GTX 1050, RX 460, and 1050 Ti, all of which tin can be had below $140.

Information technology'due south probably most fourth dimension for an upgrade for GTX 770 owners. Don't get us wrong: The GTX 770 2GB tin can still hold its basis just fine, but only with the aid of settings reductions when playing modern AAA titles. Even for "just" 1080p performance, the likes of Ultra and Loftier aren't necessarily feasible in games like Battlefield 1.

Resolution is a worthwhile side-point, likewise. Last time we talked about the GTX 770 in depth, 1080p was really the only resolution worth considering from a review standpoint. Nosotros certainly didn't have 4K monitors in the lab nevertheless, and 1440p was still only a modest fraction of the market place. With 1920x1080 holding more than lxxx% of the gaming marketplace today, it'southward easy to believe that the share was even greater in 2013.

Things are irresolute, though, and the industry is evolving. Nosotros talked about this in our GTX 1060 and RX 480 reviews, both devices that are capable of 1440p gaming with relatively loftier graphics settings. Considering the price of each card, around $240-$250 for the lesser line devices, that'southward a major accomplishment for this twelvemonth's GPU architectures.

GTX 770 Epitomize

The GTX 770 operates on Kepler architecture, which preceded nVidia's Maxwell and electric current Pascal GPU architectures. At the time, AMD's most direct contest was the 200 series, including the R9 280X and 290 cards. The GTX 770 shipped in 2GB or 4GB quantities, with reference using a 2GB memory configuration. The GTX 770 hosts 1536 CUDA cores with a base clock of 1046MHz and boost of 1085MHz, but there are a few of import things to annotation here.

First of all, a cadre does non necessarily equal a core. You lot can't ever directly compare devices betwixt architectures. CUDA cores became virtually 40% more efficient in performance per watt with generational increases, and that's without acknowledging Pascal's improvements. Newer cards with fewer cores can still outperform the 770's 1536 CUDA cores, and that's a result of the block layout, cache, procedure node, subsystems treatment compression or job management, frequency, and whatsoever number of other variables. We talked about a lot of these in our GTX 1080 and GP100 architecture deep dives, if you're curious. The GTX 980 review besides contained data more relevant to the Kepler->Maxwell jump.

Boost has besides changed significantly. Boost three.0 now modulates the frequency to such a degree that all cards are effectively car-overclocked by looking at thermal headroom, power headroom, and voltage headroom to the core. The more room these three measurements can afford, the higher the clock boosts -- and information technology does so until it hits a limit, which is frequently ability on partner designs and thermals on reference designs. With the GTX 770, the clock was pretty simple: You play the game, it hits a max specified speed and mostly stays there. Heave relied on fewer variables "back and then," all those years ago, and removed a lot of variance between devices. You'd also get less functioning overall out of the device, though, compared to today's cards where 90% of the overclocking is done for you.

We're focusing solely on FPS testing for today. We besides only have this GTX 770 2GB reference unit, and then your overclocked models may vary in functioning. If you're wondering why we aren't testing Model Ten or Model Y that you own, it's considering we don't own it. This is the GTX 770 we have. It'south nonetheless a strong baseline for performance, and will still exist closer to pre-OC 770s than virtually mod equivalents.

Game Exam Methodology

We tested using our GPU test bench, detailed in the table below. Our thanks to supporting hardware vendors for supplying some of the test components.

Battleground ane and Gears of War use the AMD 16.10.one drivers, which take less than a ane% operation change from 16.10.2 in BF1. Driver package 375.57 was used for Battlefield 1 and Gears 4 testing on nVidia hardware, with 375.57 used on the GTX 1050 & GTX 1050 Ti (and GTX 770 in the retest). NVidia's 372.54 drivers were used for game (FPS) testing on the GTX 1080 and 1060. The 368.69 drivers were used for other devices. Game settings were manually controlled for the DUT. All games were run at presets divers in their corresponding charts.

Windows ten-64 Anniversary Edition was used for testing.

Each game was tested for 30 seconds in an identical scenario, then repeated three times for parity.

Average FPS, i% low, and 0.1% low times are measured. We practise not measure maximum or minimum FPS results as nosotros consider these numbers to exist pure outliers. Instead, we accept an average of the lowest 1% of results (1% low) to show real-world, noticeable dips; we then take an average of the lowest 0.1% of results for severe spikes.

GN Examination Demote 2015	Proper name	Courtesy Of	Cost
Video Card	This is what we're testing!	-	-
CPU	Intel i7-5930K CPU iii.8GHz	iBUYPOWER	$580
Memory	Corsair Dominator 32GB 3200MHz	Corsair	$210
Motherboard	EVGA X99 Classified	GamersNexus	$365
Ability Supply	NZXT 1200W HALE90 V2	NZXT	$300
SSD	HyperX Savage SSD	Kingston Tech.	$130
Case	Height Deck Tech Station	GamersNexus	$250
CPU Cooler	NZXT Kraken X41 CLC	NZXT	$110

For Dx12 and Vulkan API testing, we utilise the PresentMon onPresent variable, then use our own Python script to excerpt the information.

Specific Test Methodologies for Games

• Battlefield 1

• Battlefield one HBAO & SSAO

• Gears of State of war 4

• DOOM

• Call of Duty: Blackness Ops Iii

• GTA V

Video Cards Tested

• MSI GTX 1050 Ti Gaming 10 ($165)
• MSI GTX 1050 OC
• Corsair Hydro GFX GTX 1080 ($750)
• Sapphire RX 470 Platinum (~$180?)
• MSI RX 480 Gaming X
• MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X ($290)
• NVIDIA GTX 1060 Iron ($300)
• AMD RX 480 8GB ($240)
• NVIDIA GTX 1080 Founders Edition ($700)
• NVIDIA GTX 980 Ti Reference ($650)
• NVIDIA GTX 980 Reference ($460)
• NVIDIA GTX 980 2x SLI Reference ($920)
• AMD R9 Fury X 4GB HBM ($630)
• AMD MSI R9 390X 8GB ($460)
• And more

GTX 770 Battlefield ane Criterion vs. GTX 1070, 970, RX 480, RX 470

Our Battlefield one testing methodology is defined in our BF1 GPU review, posted here.

Looking at 1080p/Ultra functioning with DirectX 11 (ignoring Dx12 for this test), the GTX 770 is capable of outputting 43FPS AVG with lows around 37 and 35FPS. That lands the card merely beneath what the GTX 1050 is capable of and about the aforementioned as what the RX 460 does. If this sounds too low, keep in mind that generational changes too hateful waning driver support and optimizations for older hardware. The drivers used exercise have optimized BF1 performance for Kepler, but the 770 with 2GB VRAM is still well beneath the GTX 1050 Ti, and is approximately 3x slower than the GTX 1070. Because the GTX 770 was originally $400 at launch, the GTX 1070 would be both the namesake replacement and the price-point replacement for the 770. Such an upgrade moves performance from below 50FPS to in a higher place 120FPS AVG at 1080p, with the GTX 1070 sustaining lows well above 60FPS.

Just upgrading to an RX 470 would exist a worthwhile jaunt in this title, and at an affordable toll, but a $200 investment in a GTX 1060 would yield framerates nearing 100FPS at 1080p. If you're upgrading your GPU merely keeping the monitor, one of these devices would make a lot of sense. A 1440p monitor upgrade in-step with the GPU would lucifer well with a GTX 1070.

DOOM Criterion (Vulkan, OpenGL) - GTX 770 vs. GTX 1070, 970, RX 480

With DOOM at 1080p and using OpenGL, nosotros're seeing the GTX 770 output a framerate of near 44FPS AVG, with 0.1% lows that dip nearing 20FPS. This places the card right around the GTX 950 and RX 460, both low-stop devices that most feel like they should withal be worse than the 770.

The GTX 1050 Ti operates at around 72FPS AVG. The GTX 1060 Gaming Ten at 101.3FPS AVG.

When we switch over to Vulkan, functioning however has the GTX 770 around 40FPS AVG, easily outperformed by nearly every other menu in the stack.

Call of Duty Benchmark - GTX 770 vs. RX 480, GTX 970, GTX 1070, GTX 1080

Looking at Black Ops Iii with the memory limitation disabled, we're posting an average FPS of 66 at 1080p with High settings. The $165 MSI GTX 1050 Ti Gaming X, meanwhile, is operating at 78FPS average with lows closer to 60FPS. The R9 380X outperforms the GTX 770 reasonably, but this is likewise a title which tends to prove AMD more favor than in another games.

The GTX 1060 provides a 2x performance proceeds over the GTX 770, with the GTX 1070 providing well-nigh a 3x performance gain. The RX 480 Gaming X also posts a functioning nigh double what the GTX 770 can output.

Metro: Last Light - GTX 770 vs. GTX 1080, 1070, 970, RX 480, 470

If nosotros look at older games, like Metro: Concluding Calorie-free, we run into the GTX 770 is able to keep upwards ameliorate with the GTX 1050, GTX 1050 Ti, and R9 380X. Nosotros recollect this demonstrates well the differences that driver back up can make, since newer games volition get their most immediate driver evolution focused on the flagship architectures from each vendor. Metro hasn't needed updates for some time at present -- it'due south a stable game that released years ago, and is pretty much stagnant in both game and driver development. The GTX 770 does well here, relative to its performance elsewhere. The 1070 outperforms the GTX 770 by most 2x, with the 1080 commencement to cap-out against a performance ceiling with the CPU.

GTA 5 Criterion - GTX 770 vs. GTX 1070, RX 480, More than

GTA Five is a difficult-hitting title that released last year, and so had a good mix of back up for Kepler and 200-series cards at launch. The GTX 770 is able to drive 62FPS AVG with Very High and Ultra graphics, finer maxed other than the avant-garde graphics tab, and is flanked by the R9 380X and GTX 1050 cards. The GTX 1050 Ti keeps its trend of slightly outpacing the GTX 770 -- in this case, by virtually 4-5FPS AVG -- and the RX 470 is about 15FPS ahead, or a 24% modify. The RX 480 8GB card operates at 85FPS AVG, or 37.5% change, with the GTX 1070 offer nearly a 2x gain in functioning.

Even so, though, the GTX 770 is what y'all'd considering "playable" for GTA Five at these settings.

Bank check the link in the description below for Mirror's Edge: Catalyst benchmarks, forth with some boosted information.

Mirror'southward Edge Goad Benchmark on GTX 770

The GTX 770 2GB card barely manages Mirror'southward Edge: Catalyst at ~40FPS, and has lows that are far downward enough (25FPS 0.i% low) to interfere with game fourth dimension. You'd have to run MEC at a lower quality setting to properly play, which is certainly possible -- there's a lot below "ultra." This exam isn't to show that the GTX 770 can "no longer play games," because that's wrong; only it does show that, for games like MEC, a newer menu is required to sustain maxed quality settings.

Shadow of Mordor Benchmark on GTX 770 vs. GTX 1060, 1070

Shadow of Mordor outputs a framerate of roughly 52FPS on the GTX 770 at 1080/Ultra, which has the carte flanked by the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti cards. We're seeing ~2-2.25x gains on the GTX 1070, with the RX 480 posting gains of 23FPS AVG over the GTX 770.

Upgrading GTX 770 - Which Video Card?

For the most part, the GTX 770 is withal capable of playing modernistic games like Battlefield 1, but yous'd have to reduce settings to sustain those higher framerates. If keeping graphics quality settings closer to ultra or high is important, there are a few options for upgrades.

The linear step would be the GTX 1070, which offers anywhere from a 2-3x gain in functioning at 1080p with games tested. This jump would also allow you lot to upgrade to a 1440p monitor or greater. If trying to keep a 1080p monitor setup to stretch out investment, buying something like the RX 480 or GTX 1060 would brand the most sense as a mid-costed option. The RX 470 does post reasonable performance gains over the GTX 770, upwards of 24% in some titles, but information technology just doesn't feel quite worth the upgrade when considering the relative functioning of RX 480 and GTX 1060 models.

Information technology's not often that we have to talk about monitor upgrades at the same time as GPU upgrades. The by few years have more often than not causeless a 1080p display every bit a constant, and that's finally changing. This generation is really driving toward more widespread 1440p or UltraWide gaming, as the $250 cards tin handle 1440p pretty well in most games. Check our GPU reviews for more on that.

In the meantime, this hopefully provides a look at gaming performance of a two-generation old card every bit it stacks versus modern architectures. If yous'd like to help us with our content product, try supporting u.s.a. on Patreon, post-obit usa on Twitter, or subscribing on YouTube.

Editor-in-Chief: Steve "Lelldorianx" Shush
Video Producer: Andrew "ColossalCake" Coleman
Sr. Test Technician: Mike "Budekai?" Gaglione
Exam Technician: Andie "Draguelian" Burke

camposdrigh2000.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2665-gtx-770-in-2016-benchmark

Share this post